Destroy all churches : Obama silent while Saudi grand mufti targets Christianity

If the pope called for the destruction of all the mosques in Europe, the uproar would be cataclysmic. Pundits would lambaste the church, the White House would rush out a statement of deep concern, and rioters in the Middle East would kill each other in their grief. But when the most influential leader in the Muslim world issues a fatwa to destroy Christian churches, the silence is deafening.

On March 12, Sheik  Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah, the grand mufti of  Saudi Arabia , declared that it is “necessary to destroy all the churches of the region.” The ruling came in response to a query from a Kuwaiti delegation over proposed legislation to prevent construction of churches in the emirate. The mufti based his decision on a story that on his deathbed, Muhammad declared, “There are not to be two religions in the [Arabian] Peninsula.” This passage has long been used to justify intolerance in the kingdom. Churches have always been banned in Saudi Arabia, and until recently Jews were not even allowed in the country. Those wishing to worship in the manner of their choosing must do so hidden away in private, and even then the morality police have been known to show up unexpectedly and halt proceedings.

This is not a small-time radical imam trying to stir up his followers with fiery hate speech. This was a considered, deliberate and specific ruling from one of the most important leaders in the Muslim world. It does not just create a religious obligation for those over whom the mufti has direct authority; it is also a signal to others in the Muslim world that destroying churches is not only permitted but mandatory.

The Obama administration ignores these types of provocations at its peril. The  White House has placed international outreach to Muslims at the center of its foreign policy in an effort to promote the image of the United States as an Islam-friendly nation. This cannot come at the expense of standing up for the human rights and religious liberties of minority groups in the Middle East. The region is a crucial crossroads. Islamist radicals are leading the rising political tide against the authoritarian, secularist old order. They are testing the waters in their relationship with the outside world, looking for signals of how far they can go in imposing their radical vision of a Shariah-based theocracy. Ignoring provocative statements like the mufti’s sends a signal to these groups that they can engage in the same sort of bigotry and anti-Christian violence with no consequences.

Mr. Obama’s outreach campaign to the Muslim world has failed to generate the good will that he expected. In part, this was because he felt it was better to pander to prejudice than to command respect. When members of the Islamic establishment call for the religious equivalent of ethnic cleansing, the leader of the free world must respond or risk legitimizing the oppression that follows. The United States should not bow to the extremist dictates of the grand mufti, no matter how desperate the  White House  is for him to like us.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/16/destroy-all-churches/

UC MINISTRIES:  There can be no doubt that there is a growing tide of hatred for anything which is not Islamic.  The fact that Christianity is winning converts accross the east  has made it public enemy number 1.  Saudi Arabia  comes in  top of the league tables for persecuting Christians.  If as the video declares that Obama has remained silent there should be cries for his resignation.  However the question remains is he the only leader in the western world to remain silent on this matter.  So where are the voices of  the UN demanding an appology.  Accidentaly burn a Koran and we see Moslems rioting.  Innocent members of the public moslem and none moslem  alike turn up dead,  Obama immedietly is on record as appologising for any insults.  But any Fatwa or statement by some high ranking Mufti on the destruction of all churches and those in leadership grow quiet.  The ramification by such a high ranking figure has major implications.  Not just in Middle East but accross the world at large.  It sends the signal thats OK to commit crimes.  Where is the morality of such a religion that encourages the breaking of the law.  There lies the major diiference between Islam and Christianity. As the apostle Paul says we are to life in peace as much as possible with all men. 

Rom 12:18  If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men

contrast this with the recent troubles in  Afghanistan  where they were calling for the deaths of  foreigners .  It did not matter if they were innocent or not.  Mob rules is not the rule of law. 

True Christians have a love for the Law of God.  Can we say the same thing about Islam?

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s